Science and Nature

Long-time period wi-fi streaming of neural recordings for circuit discovery and adaptive stimulation in participants with Parkinson’s disease

Abstract

Neural recordings the use of invasive devices in participants can elucidate the circuits underlying mind considerations, however want to this level been little to quick recordings from externalized mind leads in a medical institution setting or from implanted sensing devices that present easiest intermittent, short streaming of time sequence data. Here, we snort the use of an implantable two-manner neural interface for wi-fi, multichannel streaming of discipline potentials in five participants with Parkinson’s disease (PD) for as a lot as 15 months after implantation. Bilateral four-channel motor cortex and basal ganglia discipline potentials streamed at home for over 2,600 h were paired with behavioral data from wearable displays for the neural decoding of states of inadequate or excessive circulation. We validated particular person-reveal neurophysiological biomarkers at some stage in original day-to-day actions and used those patterns for adaptive deep mind stimulation (DBS). This technological manner would possibly per chance well well moreover merely be widely appropriate to mind considerations treatable by invasive neuromodulation.

Recordsdata availability

The information that enhance the findings of this look come in from the corresponding writer upon realistic are watching for.

Code availability

Recordsdata were analyzed the use of Matlab 2019b (Mathworks). Code to course of and analyze neural data recorded with Summit RC+S is accessible at https://github.com/openmind-consortium/Diagnosis-rcs-data, and code used to own the figures in this paper is accessible at https://github.com/roeegilron/rcsAtHome.

References

  1. 1.

    Lozano, A. M. et al. Deep mind stimulation: present challenges and future directions. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 15, 148–160 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  2. 2.

    Voytek, B. & Knight, R. T. Dynamic community verbal replace as a unifying neural foundation for cognition, style, rising older, and disease. Biol. Psychiatry 77, 1089–1097 (2015).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  3. 3.

    Ritaccio, A. L. et al. Lawsuits of the Eighth World Workshop on Advances in Electrocorticography. Epilepsy Behav. 64, 248–252 (2016).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  4. 4.

    Starr, P. A. Fully implantable bidirectional neural prostheses: a flexible platform for innovation in neuromodulation. Front. Neurosci. 12, 619 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  5. 5.

    Solar, F. T. & Morrell, M. J. The RNS system: responsive cortical stimulation for the medication of refractory partial epilepsy. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 11, 563–572 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  6. 6.

    Meidahl, A. C. et al. Adaptive deep mind stimulation for circulation considerations: the prolonged boulevard to clinical therapy. Mov. Disord. 32, 810–819 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  7. 7.

    Rouse, A. G. et al. A power generalized bi-directional mind-machine interface. J. Neural Eng. 8, 036018 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  8. 8.

    Swann, N. C. et al. Power multisite mind recordings from a completely implantable bidirectional neural interface: skills in 5 patients with Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurosurg. 128, 605–616 (2018).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  9. 9.

    Stanslaski, S. et al. A chronically implantable neural coprocessor for investigating the medication of neurological considerations. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 12, 1230–1245 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  10. 10.

    Kremen, V. et al. Integrating mind implants with native and disbursed computing devices: a subsequent technology epilepsy administration system. IEEE J. Transl. Eng. Neatly being Med. 6, 2500112 (2018).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  11. 11.

    Wozny, T. A. et al. Effects of hippocampal low-frequency stimulation in idiopathic non-human primate epilepsy assessed by ability of a miles away-sensing-enabled neurostimulator. Exp. Neurol. 294, 68–77 (2017).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  12. 12.

    Brittain, J. S. & Brown, P. Oscillations and the basal ganglia: motor protect watch over and beyond. NeuroImage 85, 637–647 (2014).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  13. 13.

    Swann, N. C. et al. Gamma oscillations in the hyperkinetic dispute detected with power human mind recordings in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurosci. 36, 6445–6458 (2016).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  14. 14.

    de Hemptinne, C. et al. Exaggerated part-amplitude coupling in the most essential motor cortex in Parkinson disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 4780–4785 (2013).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  15. 15.

    Silberstein, P. et al. Cortico-cortical coupling in Parkinson’s disease and its modulation by therapy. Mind 128, 1277–1291 (2005).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  16. 16.

    Diminutive, S. et al. Adaptive deep mind stimulation in evolved Parkinson disease. Ann. Neurol. 74, 449–457 (2013).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  17. 17.

    Diminutive, S. et al. Adaptive deep mind stimulation for Parkinson’s disease demonstrates diminished speech side outcomes compared with aged stimulation in the extreme setting. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 87, 1388–1389 (2016).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  18. 18.

    Velisar, A. et al. Dual threshold neural closed loop deep mind stimulation in Parkinson disease patients. Mind Stimul. 12, 868–876 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Pupil
     

  19. 19.

    Swann, N. C. et al. Adaptive deep mind stimulation for Parkinson’s disease the use of motor cortex sensing. J. Neural Eng. 15, 046006 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  20. 20.

    Herron, J. A. et al. Power electrocorticography for sensing circulation diagram and closed-loop deep mind stimulation with wearable sensors in an foremost tremor affected person. J. Neurosurg. 127, 580–587 (2017).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  21. 21.

    Panov, F. et al. Intraoperative electrocorticography for physiological research in circulation considerations: suggestions and skills in 200 conditions. J. Neurosurg. 126, 122–131 (2017).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  22. 22.

    Horne, M. K., McGregor, S. & Bergquist, F. An diagram fluctuation assemble for Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE 10, e0124522 (2015).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Pupil
     

  23. 23.

    Timmermann, L. et al. The cerebral oscillatory community of parkinsonian resting tremor. Mind 126, 199–212 (2003).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  24. 24.

    Qasim, S. E. et al. Electrocorticography finds beta desynchronization in the basal ganglia-cortical loop at some stage in leisure tremor in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 86, 177–186 (2016).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  25. 25.

    Graat, I. et al. Is deep mind stimulation efficient and steady for patients with obsessive compulsive dysfunction and comorbid bipolar dysfunction? J. Influence. Disord. 264, 69–75 (2019).

    PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Pupil
     

  26. 26.

    Huang, Y., Cheeran, B., Inexperienced, A. L., Denison, T. J. & Aziz, T. Z. Applying a sensing-enabled system for guaranteeing steady anterior cingulate deep mind stimulation for wretchedness. Mind Sci 9, 150 (2019).

    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Pupil
     

  27. 27.

    Frizon, L. A. et al. Deep mind stimulation for wretchedness in the usual technology: a systematic overview. Neurosurgery 86, 191–202 (2020).

    PubMed 

    Google Pupil
     

  28. 28.

    Fasano, A. & Helmich, R. C. Tremor habituation to deep mind stimulation: underlying mechanisms and alternate solutions. Mov. Disord. 34, 1761–1773 (2019).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  29. 29.

    Lo, M. C. & Widge, A. S. Closed-loop neuromodulation programs: subsequent-technology treatments for psychiatric illness. Int. Rev. Psychiatry 29, 191–204 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  30. 30.

    Tinkhauser, G. et al. The modulatory attain of adaptive deep mind stimulation on beta bursts in Parkinson’s disease. Mind 140, 1053–1067 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  31. 31.

    Kirkby, L. A. et al. An amygdala–hippocampus subnetwork that encodes variation in human temper. Cell 175, 1688–1700 (2018).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  32. 32.

    Molina, R. et al. Anecdote of a affected person present process power responsive deep mind stimulation for Tourette syndrome: proof of knowing. J. Neurosurg 129, 308–314 (2018).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  33. 33.

    Quinn, E. J. et al. Beta oscillations in freely shifting Parkinson’s topics are attenuated at some stage in deep mind stimulation. Mov. Disord. 30, 1750–1758 (2015).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  34. 34.

    Syrkin-Nikolau, J. et al. Subthalamic neural entropy is a feature of freezing of gait in freely shifting of us with Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 108, 288–297 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  35. 35.

    Neumann, W. J. et al. Very prolonged time period correlation of subthalamic beta band task with motor impairment in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Clin. Neurophysiol. 128, 2286–2291 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  36. 36.

    Molina, R. et al. Neurophysiological correlates of gait in the human basal ganglia and the PPN space in Parkinson’s disease. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 14, 194 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  37. 37.

    Van Gompel, J. J. et al. Anterior nuclear deep mind stimulation guided by concordant hippocampal recording. Neurosurg. Focal level 38, E9 (2015).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  38. 38.

    Vansteensel, M. J. et al. Fully implanted mind–computer interface in a locked-in affected person with ALS. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 2060–2066 (2016).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  39. 39.

    Koeglsperger, T., Mehrkens, J. H. & Botzel, K. Bilateral double beta peaks in a PD affected person with STN electrodes. Acta Neurochir. 163, 205–209 (2020).

  40. 40.

    de Hemptinne, C. et al. Therapeutic deep mind stimulation reduces cortical part-amplitude coupling in Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 779–786 (2015).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Pupil
     

  41. 41.

    Cole, S. R. et al. Nonsinusoidal beta oscillations replicate cortical pathophysiology in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurosci. 37, 4830–4840 (2017).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  42. 42.

    Postuma, R. B. et al. MDS clinical diagnostic requirements for Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 30, 1591–1601 (2015).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  43. 43.

    Pourfar, M. et al. Assessing the microlesion attain of subthalamic deep mind stimulation surgery with FDG PET. J. Neurosurg. 110, 1278–1282 (2009).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  44. 44.

    Mann, J. M. et al. Mind penetration outcomes of microelectrodes and DBS leads in STN or GPi. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 80, 794–797 (2009).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  45. 45.

    Griffiths, R. I. et al. Computerized assessment of bradykinesia and dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease. J. Parkinsons Dis. 2, 47–55 (2012).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  46. 46.

    Braybrook, M. et al. An ambulatory tremor assemble for Parkinson’s disease. J. Parkinsons Dis. 6, 723–731 (2016).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  47. 47.

    Varoquaux, G. et al. Assessing and tuning mind decoders: detrimental-validation, caveats, and guidelines. NeuroImage 145, 166–179 (2017).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  48. 48.

    Rodriguez, A. & Laio, A. Machine learning. Clustering by quick search and salvage of density peaks. Science 344, 1492–1496 (2014).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

  49. 49.

    Tomlinson, C. L. et al. Systematic overview of levodopa dose equivalency reporting in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 25, 2649–2653 (2010).

    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Pupil
     

Salvage references

Acknowledgements

We thank L. Hammer for necessary reading of the manuscript and M. Olaru for proofreading. This work was as soon as funded by NIH grant UH3NS100544 (P.A.S.).

Author data

Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurological Surgery, College of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

    Ro’ee Gilron, Randy Perrone, Robert Wilt, Coralie de Hemptinne, Maria S. Yaroshinsky, Caroline A. Racine, Sarah S. Wang, Paul S. Larson, Doris D. Wang, Heather E. Dawes & Philip A. Starr

  2. Department of Neurology, College of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

    Simon Diminutive, Jill L. Ostrem, Nick B. Galifianakis, Ian O. Bledsoe & Marta San Luciano

  3. Mayo Techniques Electrophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Sanatorium, Rochester, MN, USA

    Gregory A. Worrell & Vaclav Kremen

  4. College of Engineering and Carney Institute, Brown College, Windfall, RI, USA

    David A. Borton

  5. Department of Engineering Science, College of Oxford and MRC Mind Network Dynamics Unit, Oxford, UK

    Timothy Denison

Contributions

R.G., S.L. and P.A.S. conceived the look and experiments. J.L.O., C.A.R., P.S.L., D.D.W., N.B.G., I.O.B. and M.S.L. equipped clinical care and supervision. R.P. wrote the tool interface for Summit RC+S. R.G., S.L., M.S.Y. and R.W. soundless data. R.G., S.L., S.S.W., C.d.H., H.E.D., G.A.W., V.K., D.A.B. and T.D. equipped key analytic instruments. R.G. and P.A.S. drafted the manuscript and figures.

Corresponding writer

Correspondence to
Ro’ee Gilron.

Ethics declarations

Competing pursuits

Devices were equipped at no worth by Medtronic. P.A.S., C.d.H. and J.L.O. are inventors on US patent 9,295,838 ‘Suggestions and programs for treating neurological circulation considerations’; the patent covers cortical detection of physiological biomarkers in circulation considerations, which is moreover a topic topic in this manuscript.

Extra data

Peer overview data Nature Biotechnology thanks Ziv Williams and the assorted, nameless, reviewer(s) for his or her contribution to the look overview of this work.

Author’s attach Springer Nature remains unbiased shut to jurisdictional claims in printed maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Recordsdata Fig. 1 Localization of leads in subthalamic nucleus and over precentral gyrus: all topics.

Lead locations in all five topics, from postoperative CT scan, computationally fused with the preoperative planning MRI. The contacts appear in white (CT artifacts from their steel reveal). Left column, STN leads on axial T2 weighted MRI passing via the midbrain-diencephalic junction. The STN and red nuclei are regions of T2 hypointensity. Center and splendid column, quadripolar subdural inch leads on T1 weighted MRI (indirect sagittal passing via prolonged axis of the lead array). Pink arrow signifies central sulcus. Both contact 9 (topics 1,2,3,5) or contact 10 (field 4) is positioned on the posterior margin of precentral gyrus (most essential motor attach apart). Horizontal white line represents 2 cm.

Extended Recordsdata Fig. 2 Over 2,600 hours of motor cortex and basal ganglia discipline potentials streamed in home setting.

Assortment of hours of eight-channel neural data recorded by every affected person while awake and while asleep, before initiating therapeutic stimulation and moreover while awake at some stage in power therapeutic stimulation. Here, ‘asleep’ was as soon as outlined as 10 PM to 8 AM.

Extended Recordsdata Fig. 3 Brief in-clinic recordings attach outcomes of leovodopa and circulation.

a, Example discipline potentials recorded from splendid hemisphere, STN (high) and motor cortex (bottom). Horizontal grey line represents 300 ms, vertical line is 200 µV. b, Example spectrogram of cortical task (bipolar recordings contacts 8–10) exhibiting canonical circulation-linked alpha-beta band (8–35 Hz) decrease, and broadband (50–200 Hz) develop, in holding with placement over sensorimotor cortex (from RCS04), recorded 27 days post-implantation (sampling payment 500 Hz). Dotted vertical line is the onset of circulation. Color scale is z-scored. c, Example energy spectra of STN and motor cortex discipline potentials, and coherence between them, exhibiting oscillatory profile of off-levodopa (red) and on-levodopa (green) states (affected person RCS01), from 30 2nd recordings. d, Common PSD and coherence plots across both hemispheres, both recording montages, and all five patients. STN beta amplitude is diminished in the on-medication dispute. Horizontal bar reveals frequency bands that had necessary variations between states (p < 0.05, two sided, Bonferroni corrected). Shading in crew data represents original error of the indicate.

Extended Recordsdata Fig. 4 Energy spectra used for Parkinsonian motor dispute decoding: all topics.

Superimposed STN and motor cortex energy spectra (left two columns) and STN-motor cortex coherence (splendid column) from averaged 10 minute nonoverlapping data segments, exhibiting all data soundless at some stage in home recordings that were used for motor dispute decoding (Figs. 4,5). Recordsdata are for all five topics from both hemispheres, before starting up therapeutic stimulation. Each and each recording channels for every diagram (0–2 and 1–3 for STN, 8–10 and 9–11 for motor cortex) are represented. Each and each row reveals all data from one look field. Vertical dotted lines at 13 and 30 Hz demarcate the beta band, for visual clarity.

Extended Recordsdata Fig. 5 Unsupervised clustering segregates neural data into reveal behavioral states.

Example patients are RCS01 and RCS04. All raw data (recorded in the awake dispute) were segregated the use of unsupervised clustering algorithms with two assorted paradigms: a, Unsupervised clustering the use of a density essentially based manner25. b, Clustering of PSDs in holding with template PSDs from in clinic recording in outlined on/off medication states. Unlit lines are the template PSD’s (dotted = off medication, solid = on medication). c, Concordance with mind states derived from wearable display screen. Barcodes evaluate motor dispute estimates derived from the wearable displays, with the clusters derived from form of clustering algorithm (24 hour data sample).

Extended Recordsdata Fig. 6 Sleep strongly impacts neural biomarkers.

Example data from RCS01,220 hours of recording whereby states were segregated by bilateral wearable displays. PKG display screen classifications were used to segregate PSD’s (10 minute averages) to ‘off’ (orange), ‘on’ (green) and ‘sleep’ (sunless) states. Voice that the ‘sleep’ dispute is characterised by profound reductions in STN beta band oscillations, STN broadband task, and all gamma band oscillations, however will enhance in low frequency (<12 Hz) task in cortex, and in most of the pairwise cortex-STN coherence plots. STN = subthalamic nucleus, MC = motor cortex, coh=coherence between STN and motor cortex.

Extended Recordsdata Fig. 7 Effects of original therapeutic DBS on oscillatory task.

a, Energy spectrum averaged over all off-stimulation and on-stimulation data in a single field (RCS01), over a entire of 352 hours of recording at home at some stage in waking hours. Left location, power recording from identical quadripolar STN contact array (sense contacts 0–2) as utilized for therapeutic stimulation, with prick worth in beta band task at some stage in stimulation (p < 0.001, two sided) (arrow). Factual location, simultaneously soundless data recorded from motor cortex (sense contacts 9–11), reveals stimulation-brought about frequency shift in gamma task13 and no concomitant alternate in cortical beta band task. Common PSDs for all 10 min data segments segregated by off stimulation (green), and on stimulation (gray). Shading represents one original deviation. Variations in filters implemented at some stage in stimulation would possibly per chance well well moreover merely attach the baseline shifts above 30 Hz. b, Violin plots exhibiting the moderate beta energy (5 Hz window surrounding high) off/on power stimulation in three topics (895 entire hours of recording). In two examples, power open loop STN DBS both reduces median STN beta band task, and collapses the biomodal distribution of beta task to a unimodal one. In a single example (RCS03 L side), power open loop DBS moreover reduces median STN beta band task, however the distribution remains bimodal (arrow), suggesting persistence of motor fluctuations at some stage in DBS.

Supplementary data

About this text

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this text

Gilron, R., Diminutive, S., Perrone, R. et al. Long-time period wi-fi streaming of neural recordings for circuit discovery and adaptive stimulation in participants with Parkinson’s disease.
Nat Biotechnol (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00897-5

Salvage quotation

Related Articles

Back to top button