Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Notebook computer Review: 4GB of VRAM Goes Backwards

The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti is a mainstream GPU for gaming laptops, sitting below the RTX 3060 within the product stack, and offering us a discover up to final twelve months’s GTX 1660 Ti and GTX 1650 for laptops. With the graduation from GTX to an RTX product, this means we’re station to avoid losing ray tracing and DLSS ingredients. The latter in issue ought to soundless carry a nice boost for this accepted section.

The RTX 3050 Ti used to be announced alongside the RTX 3050 for laptops a pair of months within the past, but with ongoing provide constraints, it’s taken us a piece longer to ranking samples in hand.

For the time being, pricing appears to be like to be in all locations for laptops. Nvidia in the beginning listed the RTX 3060 as destined for $1,000 laptops, with the RTX 3050 at $800 and presumably the RTX 3050 Ti sitting somewhere in between.

This would match the baseline costs of GTX 1660 Ti techniques from old generations. On the replacement hand these pricing targets are a piece optimistic, most practical 3050 Ti machine configurations are above $1,000, even though soundless $100-200 not up to the actual same mannequin with the RTX 3060 inner. It’s a piece not easy to evaluate generations correct now, but that wants to be a rough guide to where Nvidia are positioning this GPU.

The RTX 3050 Ti Notebook computer GPU is in line with fresh GA107 silicon, which has yet to reach the desktop market. Nonetheless as frequent, when the RTX 3050 Ti launches on desktop, this may perchance per chance well well additionally likely manufacture in a different intention to the pc non-public computer section with the same name.

Overall specifications comprise 20 SMs for a total of 2560 CUDA cores, 20 RT cores and 80 Tensor cores. Clock accelerates to 1695 MHz boost at 80W, or as tiny as 1035 MHz for the 35W configuration, giving us comparatively a wide energy differ of 35 to 80W.

There’s additionally valid 4GB of GDDR6 reminiscence on a 128-bit bus, clocked at 12 Gbps. Typically the 3050 Ti is designed to be two thirds of an RTX 3060 in its SM depend and VRAM capability.

Nvidia is additionally attempting to cater to each and every fashioned gaming laptops, and ultraportable techniques, with the RTX 3050 Ti’s gigantic energy differ including 35W devices that beforehand would were branded as “Max-Q.”

This makes it crucially basic to take a look at the facility specifications of any pc non-public computer you’re attempting for, as 80W devices won’t draw conclude to 35W devices in performance, and sadly Nvidia is using the same name for every and every. Nowadays’s take a look at machine is the XMG Core 17, a neat 17-race gaming pc non-public computer with a highlight on performance and performance.

I’ve been positively impressed with what XMG has equipped within the past by draw of cooling, build quality and overall hardware. The Core 17 just isn’t any exception and it’s a straightforward form built for price. Whenever you’re attracted to this particular XMG mannequin take a look at it out right here, however the findings from this evaluate ought to soundless apply to many RTX 3050 Ti laptops.

Internally, there may perchance be Core i7-11800H processor and 16GB of twin-channel DDR4-3200 reminiscence, correct hardware preference that may perchance per chance presumably additionally not hinder performance. There’s additionally a 1080p 144Hz IPS point to and 1TB of SSD storage. The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti inner runs at 80 – 95W with dynamic boost enabled, so we’re getting a stare upon the absolute most practical energy configuration Nvidia permits for this section. Resizable BAR is additionally supported.

The point of interest of this evaluate will be on 1080p attempting out with Optimus enabled, which is the default configuration in most laptops that sees the GPU’s output routed via the iGPU to the purpose to. We’ve additionally examined at 1440p using an exterior point to connected straight to the GPU, which offers us the least microscopic skills at a greater resolution. On to the charts…


We’ll kick issues off with a stare upon Metro Exodus, working Ultra settings at 1080p. Right here the RTX 3050 Ti performs roughly on par with the RTX 2060 in reasonable frame price, placing it a tiny earlier than the GTX 1660 Ti, all with same energy limits.

On the replacement hand the 3050 Ti does possess the lowest 1% low figure, no matter getting a basic CPU that ought to not pose a CPU bottleneck for this class of GPU. In comparability to the RTX 3060, the 3050 Ti ends up 17% slower on the same energy restrict, and 34% slower when comparing the absolute most practical energy limits every GPU has to provide.

It’s a same enviornment at 1440p. Whereas the RTX 3050 Ti isn’t badly unplayable, specifically whenever you happen to plunge the quality settings from Ultra to High, this GPU soundless ends up 25% slower than the RTX 3060 when comparing 80W vs 80W configurations.

In Borderlands 3 examined using 1080p Ultra settings, the RTX 3050 Ti is faster than the 90W RTX 2060, a healthy 7 percent faster in truth, even though this reduces to a 7 percent deficit when comparing to the 115W RTX 2060. With that acknowledged, we’re having a stare upon 11 percent faster performance than the GPU it’s replacing, the GTX 1660 Ti, and 14% worse performance than the RTX 3060 at 80W.

At 1440p as soon as more that it’s possible you’ll presumably presumably additionally watch the RTX 3050 Ti is a class within the succor of its RTX 3060 compatriots. On this issue recreation, the upper energy RTX 3060 at 115W is 40% faster than the RTX 3050 Ti, which is a gigantic performance enhance even though in any case the upper tier GPU does possess 50% extra CUDA cores to transfer with its greater energy restrict.

In Purple Ineffective Redemption 2, the RTX 3050 Ti is as soon as more on par with the RTX 2060 90W configuration at 1080p using High settings. This locations it a tiny faster than the GTX 1660 Ti, about 6 percent faster in this title. Whereas right here’s seriously playable at 1080p, it’s a transparent class below the RTX 3060, which offers 31% greater frame charges even with the decrease 80-95W energy mannequin.

Then at 1440p, the RTX 3050 Ti struggles. It’s in any case aggressive with the RTX 3060 80W, but nicely within the succor of the upper energy variant which is ready to provide a 60 FPS skills at this resolution and quality settings.

Rainbow Six Siege working at 1080p Medium settings offers us a correct stare upon how GPU microscopic you’ll in general be in aggressive shooters. The 3050 Ti is basic enough that it’s not too a ways off laptops that are absolutely CPU microscopic with extra basic hardware, but it absolutely’s additionally valid a tiny GPU microscopic, offering 220 FPS versus the 260+ FPS we know this CPU can address. On the replacement hand right here’s clearly very perfect performance for a pc non-public computer, the 3050 Ti is bigger than enough for this recreation.

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla using 1080p Very High settings is a piece of a ache for the RTX 3050 Ti. These settings fresh a right VRAM limitation for a 4GB card just like the 3050 Ti, with even the recurring GTX 1060 6GB delivering better performance as a result of its further 2GB of VRAM.

This reveals the priority with Nvidia going backwards on VRAM capability in this label tier, the GTX 1660 Ti historical to provide 6GB but the cut price to 4GB is exclusively not enough for some in kind titles like this. And naturally the priority just isn’t any better at 1440p, with the upper resolution straining the VRAM capability further.

Cyberpunk 2077 is on the full not playable on the RTX 3050 Ti using Ultra settings at 1080p, this preset is exclusively too valuable for a GPU like this, so I’d strongly recommend decreasing to Medium settings. VRAM does play a section within the performance deficit between this GPU and the RTX 2060, but it absolutely’s not the same ache as we valid saw in Assassin’s Creed. The RTX 3060 is a valuable better preference for this recreation and settings aggregate, offering on the least 35% extra performance at a same energy stage.

At 1440p in this title, performance falls away even extra difficult, now with a 1% low of valid 9 FPS. Right here’s as soon as more as a result of having valid 4GB of VRAM, these settings are correct on the threshold at 1080p and presumably limiting performance to a couple of level, then you progress up to 1440p and it’s valid too valuable. This additionally causes disorders with ray tracing, as this characteristic will increase VRAM allocation, which within the games I attempted like Cyberpunk tends to guide to a carefully compromised ray tracing skills even with DLSS enabled (you’re having a stare upon medium or decrease settings with minimal stage RT).

In Horizon Zero Break of day using most settings at 1080p, the RTX 3050 Ti is a tiny faster than the RTX 2060 90W, delivering a nice 60 FPS skills on the native pc non-public computer point to. With that acknowledged, performance is 18% within the succor of the absolute most practical energy configuration of the RTX 3060.

At 1440p, the sport remains to be playable using the absolute most practical settings which is mountainous to explore, even though you’ll need to resolve for below 60 FPS and be determined you aren’t using Optimus.

Loss of life Stranding at 1080p reveals the RTX 3050 Ti to as soon as extra be right same in gaming performance to the RTX 2060 90W configuration. This GPU is 15% slower than the RTX 3060 at 80W, and beyond that we initiate hitting CPU obstacles with some GPUs.

At 1440p, while the sport is playable using the Very High preset, performance is nicely down from the RTX 3060 in even its atrocious 80W configuration.

The closing recreation we’re having a stare upon intimately is Grime 5. On this title at 1080p using the Ultra Preset, I was ready to hit same performance between the RTX 3050 Ti and the RTX 2060 at 90W, not unsuitable. Efficiency ends up 15% slower than the RTX 3060 80W, and 26% slower than the upper energy configuration.

Within the period in-between at 1440p, the 3050 Ti does withhold up to a couple of level, even though you ought to soundless are waiting for a 40 FPS skills so that that it’s possible you’ll presumably presumably additionally need to diminish quality settings.

Efficiency Comparisons

Making an are attempting at some head to head comparisons within the bigger suite of games that we examined overall, the tip end result is that the RTX 3050 Ti is comparatively such as the RTX 2060 at a same energy configuration.

In games that aren’t VRAM or CPU microscopic at 1080p, on reasonable the 3050 Ti is within a couple of percent. On the replacement hand, the cut price in VRAM from 6GB to 4GB is a killer in titles like Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, Maintain a watch on, and Cyberpunk 2077 with ray tracing enabled – in those games you’ll need to flip down quality settings, where performance wants to be restored to RTX 2060 stage, while the RTX 2060 just isn’t microscopic in this draw.

The RTX 2060 used to be additionally accessible in a 115W energy configuration. Using a microscopic sequence of games, the RTX 3050 Ti appears to be like to be around 10 percent slower outside of eventualities where the VRAM restrict comes into play. This offers a precious stare upon highest energy restrict vs highest energy restrict, even though I ought to soundless point to that the large majority of 2060 gaming laptops I’ve considered use both an 80W or 90W restrict, not 115W.

Then when having a stare upon the 3050 Ti vs GTX 1660 Ti, the 1660 Ti beforehand used to be in this recurring enviornment where in heaps of games it wasn’t that valuable slower than the RTX 2060 on the same selection of energy restrict.

When comparing 80W vs 80W, the 3050 Ti used to be 7 percent faster in a microscopic sequence of games at 1080p, with the appropriate outcomes within the 10%+ differ. Though as soon as more, the VRAM restrict is one thing to withhold in thoughts, as the 3050 Ti has valid 4GB vs the 1660 Ti’s 6GB.

Up against in kind GPUs, the 3050 Ti doesn’t fare as nicely. At 1080p, this mainstream GPU used to be 21% slower on reasonable than the RTX 3060 configured to a same energy restrict. This ought to soundless give you a principle of the performance differences between the GPUs in a same pc non-public computer chassis built for 80W, which wants to be precious as many laptops draw with alternatives for both GPU. This does embody some VRAM microscopic outcomes, with out those the margin reduces to roughly 15% slower.

On the replacement hand, the margin grows at 1440p, as as soon as more VRAM is a extra basic aspect at this resolution. Whereas the RTX 3060 is capable at 1440p, I don’t in truth feel the RTX 3050 Ti is as correct, and on the full I’d need to follow 1080p point to alternatives which is what this selection of GPU used to be designed for.

Evaluating highest energy restrict vs highest energy restrict, it’s a piece of a slaughter for the RTX 3050 Ti, as the RTX 3060 when pushed up to its most of 115W is loads faster. This chart at 1080p reveals the RTX 3050 TI as being 28% slower on reasonable, even though there are some gigantic outliers in there.

At 1440p it gets even worse, with the RTX 3060’s highest energy configuration offering 50% better performance outside of VRAM microscopic titles, or alternatively the RTX 3050 Ti is 32% slower. Right here’s based mostly entirely mostly on the specification differences.

What We Learned

Starting with the correct stuff, the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti offers largely the same performance as the older RTX 2060 when configured at a same energy stage. This continues Nvidia’s kind of bringing improved performance on the more fresh generation, on the full same to a tier above from the old gen. The fresh market makes it not easy to designate comparisons to old years, but RTX 3050 Ti laptops wants to be more cost-effective than RTX 2060 pc non-public computer originate costs.

The 3050 Ti additionally offers modest performance improvements over the GTX 1660 Ti in what wants to be the same label class. At roughly 10% faster, it doesn’t designate it a need to have interaction if GTX 1660 Ti devices are accessible at a cut price, however the RTX 3050 Ti does make stronger ray tracing and DLSS, where the GTX 1660 Ti would not.

More moderen laptops ought to soundless additionally possess the advantage of faster CPUs which possess vastly improved over the old couple of years. Even supposing right here’s irrelevant to the RTX 3050 Ti GPU itself, it’s a consideration when focusing on particular pc non-public computer devices.

On the much less stellar side, using valid 4GB of VRAM feels insufficient for the performance stage this GPU offers. Being RTX 2060-like in performance capability the 3050 Ti ought to soundless possess no disadvantage with 1080p gaming at Ultra settings, and for primarily the most section that’s appropriate — except texture sizes exceed the VRAM buffer, which is diminished from 6GB to 4GB of GDDR6 relative to the 2060. In some games that’s insufficient even at 1080p, let alone within the lengthy race which is ready to almost no doubt watch even extra VRAM usage.

Now, there may perchance be a place within the marketplace for 4GB VRAM cards, entry-stage alternatives just like the GTX 1650 is one instance where it is bright, as you’ll on the full be taking half in on medium environment as the GPU overall isn’t basic enough for Ultra. Nonetheless the RTX 3050 Ti is a ways faster than the GTX 1650, opening the door for gaming at greater quality settings or resolutions, where 4GB can bottleneck the card earlier than the CUDA cores are saturated.

The VRAM cut price in this label class additionally hurts ray tracing, which tends to allocate extra VRAM than feeble rasterization. It’s good to carry ray tracing to diminish label tiers, but there’s not valuable point whenever you don’t provide enough VRAM to address its increased demands (and even undeniable rendering for that matter).

The RTX 3050 Ti additionally faces right opponents from Nvidia’s possess line-up. The RTX 3060 is a ways faster, offering ~35% extra performance at a same 80W energy stage, or 50% extra when the RTX 3060 is configured at its most 115W restrict. That’s a valuable bigger margin than in greater tiers, where one thing just like the RTX 3070 is greatest 20% earlier than the 3060.

With the RTX 3060 on the full costing $100-200 extra in an in any other case same pc non-public computer, the RTX 3060 is a valuable better deal for avid gamers as you ranking the VRAM boost and a colossal performance jump. Secret agent not easy enough and that it’s possible you’ll presumably presumably gain first price mainstream or mid-differ gaming laptops with this GPU with out having to transfer too excessive-cease.

That’s the actual stinger for those hoping for one thing mountainous price that’s price attempting for in on the present time’s market. For much less gaming centric laptops, the RTX 3050 Ti stays a solid GPU, but it absolutely’s not touchdown that price candy space some had been hoping for.

Shopping Shortcuts
  • GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptops on Amazon
  • GeForce RTX 3060 Laptops on Amazon
  • GeForce RTX 3070 Laptops on Amazon
  • Core i7 Tiger Lake Laptops on Amazon
  • Ryzen 7 5800H Laptops on Amazon

Related Articles

Back to top button
%d bloggers like this: